November 2009 Archives

Damon Martin, takes a primary role in the development of technical and sales direction for SKT, a national Unified Communications consulting firm based in the central US.  Damon executes consulting practices and sales methodologies developed to ensure organizations realize the promise of Unified Communications.

Here, Damon discusses what's changed in the workplace - and what's becoming more relevant.

For many of us that have been consulting on Unified Communications for years it is hard to see the transformations when they are happening.  I remember talking to organizations about CTI when the idea that your computer could talk to your PBX was bleeding edge.    There has been an enormous amount of discussion in the past year about Unified Communications and its business impact.  An interesting transition for me has been that I don't find myself answering the question "What is Unified Communications?" anymore.  Instead, I find myself talking to organizations about what Web 2.0 and social networking mean to their business. The reality is that those questions are a natural progression of the dialog.  There is an inherent link between Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn and other social networking tools and Unified Communications.


What is changing in the workplace?
There is awareness within today's workplaces that we have to find ways to become more productive.  The effects of today's economic environment and acceptance of the "new normal" have allowed us to see the workforce output that is expected for information workers at our companies.  That productivity is fueled by an increasing demand for a collaborative working culture.  There are several trends that are emerging in the new workplace:

  • Unwillingness to return to previous employment levels
  • Demands for higher productivity from information workers
  • Elimination of organizational layers
  • Increasing expectations for staff to take on a variety of roles and responsibilities

There is an interesting phenomenon of the new workforce; workers are finding an environment where they are being forced to collaborate with others at a much higher degree than was required previously.  This pressure has a logical conclusion that we are seeing play out in many organizations:

  1. Workers need to collaborate quickly and effectively and today's phones and email are not fast enough with most communications resulting in a voicemail or replies hours later.
  2. Workers have become accustomed to instant access to friends and family with text messages, Facebook, Twitter and instant messaging.

The result is that workers have a desire and need to use collaboration tools.  If we look at Unified Communications as a tool and explore its ability to add business value by driving collaboration, we can start to understand how social networking is an indication of the willingness of our teams to embrace Unified Communications and Collaboration.

Why is Web 2.0 relevant?
The key to the adoption of Unified Communications in the workplace is embracing it as a collaboration tool.  The question about whether people can use social networking tools to collaborate has been answered by the prolific growth of tools and social network sites.  The burden now is on solutions providers and vendors to help executives at companies understand how to leverage a Unified Communications platform to provide a tool-set.  Businesses need to continue growing productivity without returning to the staffing levels they that drove up costs.  We hear the question "how can we get our staff to embrace Unified Communications".  The key is to understand that they already have by tweeting feedback at a trade show or posting pictures of grandchildren on Facebook.  The vendors are doing a good job of showing demos of how Unified Communications works to IT departments.  In the interim, workers are finding ways to collaborate because they have to stay competitive and provide the output that is expected in today's workplace. 

Conclusion
It is time for the technology departments to accept that Unified Communications is not something that can be migrated to over time or tested for small user groups.  Businesses are not going to back away from demands for increasing productivity.  Workers have realized that collaborative communication is the way to make productivity sustainable.  We have to work to help organizations understand that Unified Communications and Collaboration (UCC) is where the consumer acceptance of social networking and the business software for Unified Communications come together. 


Damon originally posted this blog entry at the SKT Blog earlier in November 09.  You can follow Damon on Twitter.

I had an interesting meeting with a customer last week regarding the use of social networking. This is a large broker dealer with several thousand financial advisors across the country.


The IT department is getting pressure from the business users to allow the use of Facebook, LinkedIn and Twitter all of which they currently block. When I asked them why the business units wanted access to these sites, they gave me three reasons:

  1. The financial advisors are telling them that referrals they get through Facebook and LinkedIn tend to convert to clients at a much higher rate than any other channel. This resonated with me - at FaceTime we constantly remind our salespeople to leverage their social networks for prospecting. It is well know that human beings are tribal by nature and are more likely to respond to someone who is "connected" to them in someway - even when you have millions of connections!
  2. Their marketing group is focused on the 35-45 year old demographic since this is where people hit the peak of their earning power and start thinking about financial planning. Getting clients in their late thirties means you can hang on to them 20-30 years. Turns out that the over-35 demographic is the fastest growing user group at Facebook and the largest segment for both LinkedIn and Twitter.
  3. Finally, the company is finding that their ability to recruit at college campuses and MBA schools is enhanced by their Facebook and Twitter presence. As we all know, college kids live with these technologies and businesses that block access are seen as old school.


I am hearing similar reasons from other customers across all industry groups. Enterprises are recognizing the power of social networking to recruit new customers, stay in touch with existing customers and enhance communication with their employee base.


Of course there are several challenges that need to be overcome. In a survey FaceTime conducted in June of this year, organizations identified their top three concerns as content leakage, regulatory and corporate compliance and reputation damage.

"I am not worried about the guy who wants to steal information" the IT manager at a large services firm said to me. "I am worried about mistakes. People don't realize that competitors can also see your status update on LinkedIn and if you're talking about working on a particular project, you've just told the world." The inadvertent leakage of content is a common concern among the security managers I speak with.

On the compliance front, regulatory authorities are increasingly focusing on the use of these networks within regulated industries such as financial services, energy and healthcare. For example, FINRA, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, recently formed a Social Networking Task Force to look into the compliance challenges posed by social networking sites.

Finra CEO Rick Ketchum said, at the SIFMA Annual Meeting "Social networking sites such as Facebook or LinkedIn provide new ways to connect, inform and interact with customers... They also raise new regulatory challenges. For example, as currently designed they may not allow you to archive and maintain the communications on your own books and records."

 

Reputation damage is another concern for large enterprises. How do you track what employees and customers are saying about your company? The CIO of an electric utility company noted that they used Twitter to communicate information about outages and other emergencies to their customer base. "I worry that a disgruntled employee or customer could hijack our Twitter account and start spreading misinformation".

 

Another customer, a large bank that ran into some problems integrating an acquisition, talked about how customers were blasting the bank on Facebook and Twitter. "Because we block the use of these sites within our company, we were caught off-guard and didn't understand how we should respond to these comments." The IT manager noted. "Our marketing group is now formulating a strategy on how to leverage these platforms. We need to be more savvy about these channels."

 

Notwithstanding the challenges, it is clear that enterprises recognize the value of these sites and are motivated to overcome them. (Shamefaced sales pitch follows) FaceTime recently announced USG 3.0 which is designed to address these challenges and allow enterprises to leverage the benefits of social networking.

 

I would be interested in hearing your views on the use of social networking in your business. Do you agree with the above reasons? Are there other reasons?

About this Archive

This page is an archive of entries from November 2009 listed from newest to oldest.

July 2009 is the previous archive.

December 2009 is the next archive.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Twitter Updates

Comment/Trackback Policy

This site supports an open comment policy. Rude, wasteful, off-topic, privacy-intruding or libelous comments will be deleted. Comments will remain open unless abused.